nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geo location to IP mapping
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:58:50 -0400
At 10:39 AM 5/16/2006, Tao Wan wrote:
Here is a tech report with a survey on geolocation and evasion techniques: http://www.scs.carleton.ca/~jamuir/papers/TR-06-05.pdf
This document seems to miss one other fairly common way in which geolocation fails: VPN. Whether a single user VPN session in which the user's laptop obtains an IP address from the VPN gateway, or a subnet extended out across a VPN to a remote office, the user(s) will appear to be at the location of the VPN concentrator. While ping latency, if even transported over the VPN, may show a greater distance than other IP addresses in teh neighborhood, there is no clear way to know why that latency is higher. It's odd this was omitted.
Current thread:
- RE: Geo location to IP mapping, (continued)
- RE: Geo location to IP mapping Frank Bulk (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Peter Corlett (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Edward B. DREGER (May 16)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Alain Hebert (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Kevin Day (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Bill Nash (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Alain Hebert (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Robert Bonomi (May 15)
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Tao Wan (May 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Geo location to IP mapping Daniel Senie (May 16)
- Message not available