nanog mailing list archives
"Bad bgp identifier"
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:06:54 -0500
4271 specifies that bgp identifier must be a valid unicast ip addressSo what is the larget 32 bit value expressed as a dotted quad that meets this requirement?
Is it the last address in class c? class e? Can 255.x.x.x be used? Do all vendors implement this?I understand that draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-06.txt does away with the above requirements. Is this something I should ask vendors if they will support it?
Thanks, Joe
Current thread:
- "Bad bgp identifier" Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: "Bad bgp identifier" Owen DeLong (Mar 31)
- Re: "Bad bgp identifier" Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 31)
- Re: "Bad bgp identifier" Owen DeLong (Mar 31)