nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS TTL adherence
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:41:39 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Simon Waters wrote:
This behavior is unfortunately not unique.Alas what others peoples servers do, shouldn't be an issue for you. Your problem is they can be coerced into a DoS attack, not that the data is stale.
Tell that to a customer when you've moved some resource of theirs to a different IP...having been careful to decrease the TTL well in advance.
Some parts of the internet are simply broken and beyond your control. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- DNS TTL adherence Thurman, Steven (Mar 14)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence ennova2005-nanog (Mar 14)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Joe Maimon (Mar 14)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Simon Waters (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Rodney Joffe (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Simon Waters (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Jon Lewis (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Joe Maimon (Mar 14)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence ennova2005-nanog (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: DNS TTL adherence Thurman, Steven (Mar 15)
- RE: DNS TTL adherence Sharad Agarwal (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS TTL adherence Simon Waters (Mar 16)
- Re: FW: DNS TTL adherence Igor Gashinsky (Mar 17)
- RE: DNS TTL adherence Sharad Agarwal (Mar 15)