nanog mailing list archives

Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)


From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex () relcom net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:46:36 -0800





Thus spake <Michael.Dillon () btradianz com>
Let's face it, IPv6 is close enough to IPv4 that any
attempt to put a price on IPv4 addresses will simply
cause a massive migration to free and plentiful IPv6
addresses.

You assume that there will be a source of free and plentiful IPv6
addresses.
Why not? It is CORE idea of IPcv6 addres space (no matter whart is written
abouyt allocation policies).
And I can bet, we will see how every business can get PI space when required
(in ipv6) for multi home,
in less than 3 - 4 years.

Except if IPv6 will be replaced by something simpler and more reliable like
IPv8 (but it looks very unlikely now).


Current thread: