nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]
From: "Per Heldal" <heldal () eml cc>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:10:05 +0100
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:35:02 +0100, "Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <kurtis () kurtis pp se> said:
On 2 mar 2006, at 21.42, Andre Oppermann wrote:Putting routing decisions into the transport layer (4) as it is done or proposed with SCTP and SHIM6 is Total Evilness(tm) in my book.Not that shim6 is a change to transport though, but a change at layer 3...
Isn't the fact that shim6 doesn't affect the forwarding-plane of routers an argument that is used to its advantage? It seems more like something mingling the transport and session layers if anyone ask me (not that the old iso-model is all that relevant anymore imho). //per -- Per Heldal http://heldal.eml.cc/
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing, (continued)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Marshall Eubanks (Mar 02)
- 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Andre Oppermann (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Roland Dobbins (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Marshall Eubanks (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 03)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Edward B. DREGER (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Per Heldal (Mar 06)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 06)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Per Heldal (Mar 07)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jeroen Massar (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jeroen Massar (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Mark Newton (Mar 02)
- Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) william(at)elan.net (Mar 02)
- Re: Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) william(at)elan.net (Mar 02)