nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:39:21 -0500
On 4-Mar-2006, at 23:48, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Joe Abley wrote:No support in big networks is required, beyond the presence of shim6 in server stacks.Why do you say this? Enterprises who multihome need their client machines (tens and hundreds of thousands of them) to be able to take advantage of multihoming, as well. It's a requirement, not a luxury.
You're missing the context; by "big networks" I was referring to those who are able to obtain PI addresses, following from:
On 4-Mar-2006, at 16:31, Matthew Petach wrote:
And given that any network big enough to get their own PI /32 has *zero*incentive to install/support shim6 [...]
[I didn't mean to imply that enterprise networks weren't big or complicated.]
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG, (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Edward B. DREGER (Mar 03)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Tony Li (Mar 03)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Kevin Day (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Matthew Petach (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Marshall Eubanks (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Edward B. DREGER (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Roland Dobbins (Mar 04)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Stephen Sprunk (Mar 05)