nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Based Load Balancers
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:14:59 -0400
On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Matt Ghali wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:my recommendation is: "don't do it." for background, see:http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/ msg02168.htmlhttp://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg03572.html http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg00671.html
Having implemented F5's 3DNS product for a large entertainment company, I'd like to wholeheartedly agree with Paul.Please, for the love of god, don't do it.
Would you mind giving us a little more to go on than "the love of god" before making strategic architectural decisions?
Just in case we like to decide things for ourselves. :)For instance, was F5's implementation flawed, or do you have a reason to dislike the basic idea? And why?
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers, (continued)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Matt Ghali (Jul 01)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers David Temkin (Jul 02)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Paul Vixie (Jul 02)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers David Temkin (Jul 02)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Paul Vixie (Jul 02)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers John Payne (Jul 03)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers David Temkin (Jul 03)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Paul Vixie (Jul 03)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers David Temkin (Jul 03)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers David Temkin (Jul 02)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Matt Ghali (Jul 01)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 02)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Matt Ghali (Jul 03)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers Sam Stickland (Jul 04)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Rodrick Brown (Jul 04)
- RE: DNS Based Load Balancers Lincoln Dale (Jul 04)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Paul Vixie (Jul 05)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Henry Linneweh (Jul 06)
- Re: DNS Based Load Balancers Paul Vixie (Jul 06)