nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL Mail Problem
From: chuck goolsbee <chucklist () forest net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:03:12 -0700
I think Carl, Charles et al do a pretty good job over there.I think Carl moved on to other things in AOL.
Correct.
They still do simplistic blocks on content, i.e. containing certain types of content will cause a message to be rejected outright, without any sort of consideration of the other content of the message.
...and so will over half the mail systems on the wire today. Welcome to the 21st century.
I think that is a broken model.
Well, the *whole model* is broken. The old one, where we all trusted one another, as well as all the various new ones where we all try our best to deliver what our customers want while also blocking what they don't.
The abusers are successfully killing the very system they rely on, so I suspect that within a few years it will all be moot. In the meantime, deal with it.
Have you requested whitelisting and a feedback loop with them yet? If so, you wouldn't be having anything blocked.
--chuck goolsbee digital.forest seattle, wa
Current thread:
- AOL Mail Problem, (continued)
- AOL Mail Problem Tom Quilling (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Peter Dambier (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 27)
- AW: AOL Mail Problem Tom Quilling (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Allen Parker (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem chuck goolsbee (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem William Yardley (Jul 27)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Simon Waters (Jul 28)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem chuck goolsbee (Jul 28)
- Re: AOL Mail Problem Matthew Black (Jul 28)
- AOL Mail Problem Tom Quilling (Jul 27)