nanog mailing list archives
Re: Split flows across Domains
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:09:08 -0500
Joe Abley <jabley () isc org> writes:
On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:He said "via two different autonomous domains", which I took to mean two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway) you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is running, no?
Yes and no. CEF is {src, dst} hash IIRC, and "per-flow" usually means {src, srcport, dst, dstport, [proto, tos]} hash in my experience. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Split flows across Domains Glen Kent (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Simon Leinen (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Matt Buford (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)