nanog mailing list archives
Re: WMF patch
From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:35:10 +0000
Indeed. It's the security equivalent of "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent" - perhaps we could reformulate that as "the users can remain clueless longer than your business can survive the DDOS" On 1/5/06, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:58:16PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote a message of 46 lines which said:How many times do you propose we FTDT before we get fed up and ask upper management to authorize a migration to some other software with a better record? And how many more FTDT's do we need to tolerate while we wait for upper management to authorize a migration?There is no limit to what human beings can stand before becoming reasonable. That is human nature and the engineers' rationality is no match for it. Think about religion, for instance. A lot of people still believe in a supernatural being despite a very bad track record (much worse than MS-Windows').
Current thread:
- RE: WMF patch, (continued)
- RE: WMF patch Brance Amussen (Jan 04)
- RE: WMF patch Steve Sobol (Jan 04)
- Message not available
- Re: WMF patch Eric Frazier (Jan 05)
- Re: WMF patch Robert Boyle (Jan 05)
- Re: WMF patch Eric Frazier (Jan 05)
- RE: WMF patch Brance Amussen (Jan 04)
- RE: WMF patch Fergie (Jan 04)
- RE: WMF patch Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- RE: WMF patch Sean Donelan (Jan 04)
- RE: WMF patch Fred Heutte (Jan 04)
- Re: WMF patch Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: WMF patch Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 05)
- Re: WMF patch Alexander Harrowell (Jan 05)
- MPLS Providers Andrew Staples (Jan 05)
- Re: WMF patch Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: WMF patch Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)