nanog mailing list archives
Re: cyber-redundancy
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () world std com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:18:09 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 sgorman1 () gmu edu wrote:Agree that a level of security is required, but the real value is in customers like banks knowing where their fiber is, so when they lease service for a back up provider they know it is not in the same ditch.Does the bank actually need that information? Or does there need to be a way for the two providers to do conflict detection between their design layout groups? You don't need copies of all provider's fiber maps to do conflict detection for a particular group of circuits.
I think - as both of you both know, this has little to do with security vs. being a savvy network consumer and asking for what you need to make your purchase. Be careful with the hyperbole, you'll create a new box or something. -M<
Current thread:
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat?, (continued)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Micheal Patterson (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Jerry Pasker (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Jim Popovitch (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Jeff Shultz (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 19)
- cyber-redundancy Sean Donelan (Jan 19)
- Re: cyber-redundancy sgorman1 (Jan 19)
- Re: cyber-redundancy Martin Hannigan (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Daniel Golding (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Martin Hannigan (Jan 21)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Michael . Dillon (Jan 23)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Martin Hannigan (Jan 21)