nanog mailing list archives
Re: PI space and colocation
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:27:27 -0500
On Jan 18, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Tony Li wrote:
IMHO, wasting any resource is unfortunate, but the cost of additional forwarding table entries far outstrips the cost of additional DRAM. Thus, adding an additional prefix does merit a significant shout from others, but the stub AS should only be an incremental whimper.
It's not just the amount of resources spent, it's what you get for them.Spending a little on nothing is worse than spending more on something useful.
Personally, I think a prefix which gives routability info is useful. A Stub AS is just a waste.
-- TTFN, patrickP.S. This also means a /24 with the same AS path as the enclosing /16 is also a waste - an even bigger one.
Current thread:
- PI space and colocation up (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Jon Lewis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Chris Adams (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Michael Loftis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Stephen Sprunk (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Tony Li (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Jon Lewis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PI space and colocation Chris Ranch (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)