nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Odd policy question.
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:20:14 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
Let me attempt to bring this back to the policy question. Does someone have the *right* to put one of your IP addresses as an NS record for their domain even if you do not agree? Registrar policies imply that this is so, and has been this way for a long time.
Once upon a time, registrar/er policies did NOT allow this. NSI used to have "GUARDIAN" which controlled who could register domain names listing name servers with your IP addresses. Unfortunately, NSI never completely implemented guardian; and it pretty much completely disappeared after the trademark lawyers took over.
Current thread:
- Re: AW: Odd policy question., (continued)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Michael Loftis (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joe Abley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joe Abley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joe Abley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. william(at)elan.net (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 17)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Michael Loftis (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)