nanog mailing list archives
Re: workhorse of the future...
From: Lincoln Dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:56:33 +1100
Bill,alas, i think the days of being able to deploy one type of "god box" swiss-army-knife router are passing.
depending on what it is that the router is planned to be "doing" defines its PPS requirements & what speeds/feeds you need to run various features at.
from http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2005-09/msg00635.html can you classify what functionality you see yourself as needing?
that pretty much sets the discussion as to whether you're after something that can be s/w-forwarding or not ...
cheers, lincoln. bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
first it was the vitalinks, then the bridge gear, then proteon, then cisco AGS, then 7600VXR, then 7301s.... looking to find the next-gen workhorse ... looking for 4-6yr life expectancy. pointers(private are ok) are appreciated - as well as -why- you think the suggested boxen are likely candidates. --bill
Current thread:
- workhorse of the future... bmanning (Jan 10)
- RE: workhorse of the future... W.D.McKinney (Jan 10)
- Re: workhorse of the future... Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 10)
- Re: workhorse of the future... Lincoln Dale (Jan 11)
- Re: workhorse of the future... bmanning (Jan 11)
- RE: workhorse of the future... Christopher J. Wolff (Jan 11)
- Re: workhorse of the future... Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: workhorse of the future... bmanning (Jan 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: workhorse of the future... Scott Weeks (Jan 11)