nanog mailing list archives
Re: ml hacks for goodmail
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:08:06 +0100
* Randy Bush:
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail? "i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com address. don't ask us to explain, ask support () aol com." or am i missing something here? clue-bat if so, please.
I don't expect the existing filters will change significantly. If you've got problems routing mail to AOL customers, you are just offered another option. I would be surprised if AOL intends to make money off that service; it's probably just an experiment if this helps to curb misuse of the bypass facilities (which have already existed). What's the response of the solicited bulk mailers? Do they welcome this move? If they are too happy about it, maybe we should be worried. 8-) As far as I can tell, the filters at AOL are far less problematic than crude filters at smaller sites which simply use SORBS or bl.spamcop.net.
Current thread:
- ml hacks for goodmail Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 04)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 04)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Florian Weimer (Feb 07)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Simon Waters (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ml hacks for goodmail Jim McBurnett (Feb 05)
- Re: ml hacks for goodmail Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 04)