nanog mailing list archives
Re: Collocation Access
From: chuck goolsbee <chucklist () forest net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:04:37 -0800
Indeed. I'm surprised the market hasn't produced facilities with better thought through and executed security and access controls. Is there not enough competition in each metro area for anything other than lowest common denominator?
From what I've seen? No.At the moment, the top priority of colocation customers is power availability, followed swiftly by price.
It is slowly turning into a seller's market - IF the facility has available power (and I pity those facilities who are at their limits), but the customer is still primarily picking on $s alone.
WRT security process and procedures, most customers seem to be just interested if they exist. Of course they want them applied very strictly to everyone else but THEM.
--chuck
Current thread:
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Jim Popovitch (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Leo Vegoda (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Mark Newton (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Abley (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Leo Vegoda (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access chuck goolsbee (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Daniel Golding (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Sean Donelan (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Brandon Galbraith (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Provo (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Aaron Glenn (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access John Curran (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 28)