nanog mailing list archives
RE: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization.
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:49:38 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Frank Bulk wrote:
I wouldn't mind if upstream utilization matched downstream rates as we're essentially paying for downstream utilization, not upstream. Are there more pieces to the bandwidth puzzle that would start getting messed up if ISPs and end-users were more symmetrical in their usage?
it might also be interesting to know how tcp-stack differences affect some of the usage patterns as well. With the now widely deployed win* platform tcp stach respecting tcp-reno things work according to well understood/accepted models. Mac OSX, linux and Vista seem to NOT respect tcp-reno, and may change the models somewhat... Will this cause more spikiness on individual links? will this change in behaviour on a wide scale (vista rollout to new computers or to existing platforms) causing folks capacity planning models to fail?
Current thread:
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization., (continued)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Randy Bush (Dec 25)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Roland Dobbins (Dec 25)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Alexander Harrowell (Dec 26)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Roland Dobbins (Dec 26)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Alexander Harrowell (Dec 25)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Thomas Leavitt (Dec 25)
- RE: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Chris L. Morrow (Dec 26)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. John Kristoff (Dec 26)
- Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization. Roland Dobbins (Dec 26)