nanog mailing list archives
Re: today's Wash Post Business section
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:50:54 -0500
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis () neustar biz> writes:
Yeah, granted anyone looking for myspace might meet that demographic, but how many neophytes would use Google for a "IP Who Is" "search"? That's the listing I thought odd.
There would be very few of them if it weren't for spam. ---rob
Current thread:
- today's Wash Post Business section Edward Lewis (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Thomas Leavitt (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Edward Lewis (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Marshall Eubanks (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 20)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section James Blessing (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Robert Bonomi (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Alexander Harrowell (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Andy Davidson (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Richard P. Welty (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Jeff Shultz (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section J. Oquendo (Dec 21)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Thomas Leavitt (Dec 23)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Michael Painter (Dec 23)
- Re: today's Wash Post Business section Alexander Harrowell (Dec 21)