nanog mailing list archives
Re: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing
From: "Matthew Petach" <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:01:16 -0800
On 12/14/06, Lasher, Donn <DLasher () newedgenetworks com> wrote:
On 14 Dec 2006 09:47:46 -0500, Michael A. Patton <MAP () map-ne com> wrote: >> If there are any BGP clueful contacts at Global Crossing listening (or >> if someone listening wants to forward this to them :-), I would >> appreciate your getting in touch. >Out of curiousity, why do you think anyone here on NANOG would be willing to bother the >clueful contacts they know at provider (X) based on an email like this? It's absolutely >content-free. Having been on both sides of an issue like this one, I'd much rather see polite requests like the original requestor, rather than a 10 page dump on why provider X is severely borked. Good netiquette, seems to me.
10 page dump is excessive; but a one or two line "I'm seeing bad advertisements from AS ZZZZ at the following peering location" goes a long way to explain what the need and urgency is around the issue.
Current thread:
- Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing Michael A. Patton (Dec 14)
- Re: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing Matthew Petach (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing Lasher, Donn (Dec 14)
- Re: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing Aaron Glenn (Dec 14)
- Re: Need BGP clueful contact at Global Crossing Matthew Petach (Dec 14)