nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS Contact
From: Allan Poindexter <apoindex () aoc nrao edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:42:18 -0600
Derek> I'm gonna hold up the "I call bullshit" card here. Recipients Derek> most certainly *can* get it wrong. Sorry I wasn't very clear. The results in the hotmail example were where the users said it wasn't spam but hotmail insisted it was. It is possible for a user to indentify non-spam as spam. But if a user says it isn't spam then it isn't no matter how much it might look like it might be. I have had this happend to me personally. Some of my fellow admins at the time insisted some of my incoming mail was spam. As it happened the mail (offering some telephone products) was specifically requested.
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS Contact, (continued)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Atkins (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Rich Kulawiec (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Todd Vierling (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact william(at)elan.net (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact william(at)elan.net (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Todd Vierling (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Sobol (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Derek J. Balling (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Dave Pooser (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Joel Jaeggli (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Sobol (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Ken Simpson (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Nachman Yaakov Ziskind (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Rich Kulawiec (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Rik van Riel (Aug 09)