nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS Contact
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:48:58 +1000 (EST)
Actually there can be false positive. ISP's who put address blocks into "dialup" blocks which have the qualification that the ISP is also supposed to only do it if they *don't* allow email from the block but the ISP's policy explicitly allows email to be sent. They have a default port 25 filter that will be turned off on request. i.e. they allow direct out going email on request. The said ISP *thinks* they are doing the right thing by listing the block when in reality they are lying by listing the block. Mark
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS Contact, (continued)
- Re: SORBS Contact william(at)elan.net (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 10)
- rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Steven Champeon (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Steven Champeon (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Nicholas Suan (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: rDNS naming conventions (was: Re: SORBS Contact) Edward Lewis (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Peter Corlett (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Andrew D Kirch (Aug 11)
- Re: SORBS Contact Mark Andrews (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Mark Andrews (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Noel (Aug 10)
- Re: SORBS Contact Joe Maimon (Aug 10)
- RE: SORBS Contact David Schwartz (Aug 13)
- Re: SORBS Contact Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 13)
- Re: SORBS Contact D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Aug 14)