nanog mailing list archives
Re: data center space
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 -0400
Lincoln Dale wrote:
I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal with synchronous replication. In the world of storage networking & synchronous I/O, typically anything higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.
True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup system is much better than 1 month complete loss of service due to *poor* continuity planning. We all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?
-Jim P.
Current thread:
- Re: Google AdSense Crash, (continued)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Peter Dambier (Apr 23)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Henry Linneweh (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Peter Dambier (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Rodney Joffe (Apr 23)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Martin Hannigan (Apr 22)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 24)
- RE: data center space Lincoln Dale (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Jim Popovitch (Apr 24)
- RE: data center space Lincoln Dale (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Josh Cheney (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Edward B. DREGER (Apr 25)
- RE: data center space Edward B. DREGER (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Jeff Hayward (Apr 25)