nanog mailing list archives
Re: data center space
From: John Curran <jcurran () mail com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 06:00:05 -0400
At 9:36 PM -0400 4/19/06, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Remember when folks thought Exodus was crazy for 220w per square foot?
265w/sqft can just handle today's typical blade server power density (allowing for a reasonable amount of wire management and slightly less than full blade loading). If you look at the densities of newly released blade servers, it is not hard to hit 300w+ / sq ft. The more amusing part is those attempting to cool this via raised floor systems, as it takes 24 to 30" of raised floor to achieve the necessary airflow, and this is only going to get worse. /John
Current thread:
- data center space Philip Lavine (Apr 18)
- Re: data center space Alain Hebert (Apr 18)
- Re: data center space Mike Sawicki (Apr 18)
- Re: data center space jim bartus (Apr 19)
- Message not available
- Re: data center space Martin Hannigan (Apr 19)
- Re: data center space Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: data center space Martin Hannigan (Apr 19)
- RE: data center space Daniel Golding (Apr 19)
- Re: data center space John Curran (Apr 20)
- Re: data center space jim bartus (Apr 19)
- Re: data center space Robert Boyle (Apr 21)
- Re: data center space Jim Popovitch (Apr 21)
- Google AdSense Crash John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash william(at)elan.net (Apr 22)
- RE: Google AdSense Crash Daniel Golding (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Henry Linneweh (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Marshall Eubanks (Apr 23)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 23)