nanog mailing list archives
Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP
From: jc dill <lists05 () equinephotoart com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:20:21 -0700
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
p.s. Speaking of "unreasonable requests" - I feel it is unreasonable for a member of the moderating committee to whine that he can't filter out "undesired" posts due to using a lame email client, and to then coerce a poster into "tagging" these posts.
There are no members of the ML admins saying that.
You were a member at one point. I didn't know you had left that role "back in May" as another post mentions.
We were urged by multiple SC members to make our opinionon this issue (off topic junk) known.
The post in question was NOT "off topic junk". It was a brief cite and quote from a news article discussing the status of 3 major North American Networks following an huge storm, such a post is 100% ON-topic for the North American Network Operators Group.
Your position about tagging "off topic junk" may have merit but you picked an ON-TOPIC post to whine about. Shame on you.
jc(cc'd to nanog to clarify my position to the whole list, replies set to nanog-futures)
Current thread:
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP jc dill (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Gadi Evron (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Gadi Evron (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Alan Spicer (Sep 27)
- 209.68.1.140 (209.68.1.0 /24) blocked by bellsouth.net for SMTP Eadi Gvron (Sep 30)