nanog mailing list archives
RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:38:11 -0400
i.e. is there a pingable address in each, as has been discussed here just a few times?ping is ok, but routing table entry existence seems better. ping can fail for lots of reasons and what we're really testing is routing, not icmp end-to-end, right?
There's a difference between reachability and routability. The lack of a routing table entry indicates a different problem which implicates routing and reachability problems. I don't agree that reachability is implied with routability.
if it's useful, i'd be happy to report what percentage of my peers have/don't have routes to these prefixes.
I'd be interested. Best, -M<
Current thread:
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8, (continued)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Randy Bush (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Randy Bush (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Randy Bush (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Rob Thomas (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Randy Bush (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 20)
- RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Randy Bush (Sep 22)
- RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Rob Thomas (Sep 22)
- RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Hank Nussbacher (Sep 22)
- RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8 Todd Vierling (Sep 23)