nanog mailing list archives
Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu?
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:38:41 -0700
That's not at all surprising. PBR would be pretty hard to push into a hardware forwarding path.Not impossible, but certainly challenging.Doesn't the SUP-720(PFC3B) support (some forms of) PBR in hardware ?
As has been pointed out to me privately, the SUP-720 does flow cache PBR support. Now, if you consider a flow cache to be acceptable performance, and the flow descriptor fits within the policies that you wanna write and you fit within the performance boundaries of a SUP-720, well, that may be a suitable solution.
Tony
Current thread:
- PBR needing to hit the cpu? David Hubbard (Sep 17)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Tony Li (Sep 17)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? rafi-nanog (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Tony Li (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? rafi-nanog (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Sean Figgins (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Adam Rothschild (Sep 18)
- Time Warner Outage? Brian Boles (Sep 18)
- Re: Time Warner Outage? Justin (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Adam Rothschild (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Lincoln Dale (Sep 18)
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Tony Li (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PBR needing to hit the cpu? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sep 18)