![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!?
From: Adam Rothschild <asr+nanog () latency net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:39:12 -0400
On 2005-09-06-10:25:28, Network Fortius <netfortius () gmail com> wrote:
And how exactly would you interpret the number returned by net_loss (int), in a column called "LOSS", in reference to reachability of a "hop" between two end points [...]
I'd interpret it to mean you're hitting a control plane policer or somesuch, with no actual bearing on end-to-end performance, judging from the diagnostic output you've graciously provided us with. I find myself giving this lecture several times a week to random "gamer" customers upset that intermediary routers don't reply to their pings at full line rate; I'd expect slightly better critical thinking skills from the posters on this list, but I've been wrong before. :) -a
Current thread:
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!?, (continued)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? chip (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? sdb (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? sdb (Sep 07)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Network Fortius (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Alexander Koch (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Network Fortius (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Scott Altman (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Adam Rothschild (Sep 06)
- Message not available
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 06)
- RE: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? andrew2 (Sep 06)
- Re: level3.net in Chicago - high packet loss?!? Jared Mauch (Sep 06)