nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi homing pressure
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:47 -0400
On Oct 19, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 12:20 -0400 10/19/05, Todd Vierling wrote:That's why SLAs exist.Do SLA's say "if you are out of the water for 30 minutes we will also cover your lost business revenue?" There are some times with service guarantees just are not enough (e.g., manned space flight support).
There is no such thing as an SLA on the Internet that is worth what you lose when the line goes down.
Part of the problem of paying so little for a "mission critical" application.
And part of the reason multi-homing is so important for a "mission critical" application.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: multi homing pressure, (continued)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Jakma (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure David G. Andersen (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Michael . Dillon (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure David Andersen (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Justin M. Streiner (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward B. Dreger (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure John Payne (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Mark Radabaugh (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- RE: multi homing pressure Peter Kranz (Oct 19)