nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi homing pressure
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:33:13 -0400
In a message written on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:31:32AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
it will be interesting to see if this has acutal impact on ASN allocation rates globally.
I have done no analysis, but I do believe this is having an effect on the number of prefixes announced by many of the players involved. Looking at the top 10-20 peers over here, all of them show prefixes announced by the peers to be growing faster than the global prefix table. The only way that makes sense is if existing prefixes are being announced through additional providers. It would be interesting to see those more into BGP routing analysis to look at that (possible) trend. It's probably causing a shift in how BGP processing occures on both a device and a network level (more redundant paths) which could have implications for future gear. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- multi homing pressure Brandon Butterworth (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Vixie (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure David G. Andersen (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Jakma (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure David G. Andersen (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Michael . Dillon (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure David Andersen (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 19)