nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 news


From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:15:21 +0100


so, if we had a free hand and ignored the dogmas, what would we
change about the v6 architecture to make it really deployable
and scalable and have compatibility with and a transition path
from v4 without massive kludging, complexity, and long term
cost?

Isn't that GENI already out of the bottle?
http://www.nsf.gov/cise/geni/
http://www.ana.lcs.mit.edu/papers/PDF/Rethinking_2001.pdf
http://cfp.mit.edu/docs/overview.pdf
http://cfp.mit.edu/groups/internet/internet.html

Seems like there is enough interest in this to plan something 
for NANOG 36 early next year.

--Michael Dillon




Current thread: