nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 news


From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:18:47 +0200

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:39 +0100, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
Another alternative is to force-align allocation and topology in some 
way /other/ than by "Providers" (geographical allocation in whatever 
hierarchy, IX allocation, whatever), such that networks were easily 
aggregatable. Lots of objections though (the "providers and geography 
don't align" one though is ultimately slightly bogus, because with 
non-provider-aligned allocation policies in place it would be in 
providers interests to align their peering to match the allocation 
policy).

I think we need a researcher to sit down and 
figure out exactly what this would look like
in a sample city and a sample national provider.

There has been quite some research on it, there where ideas, there was
even talk of a vendor going to implement it, but it never happened. It
won't work because of cash reasons (read: telco/transit don't want it)

For your 'city data' check:
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/default.htm

or for pre-processed files:
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/ under "Geographical data".

especially:
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/geov6.txt

will be quite of your liking.
8<---------------------
Allocation: IANA   block = 2346::/16
Ratio in use: one /48 site for 4 persons
Allocation: 6bone   block = 3FFE:FB00::/24
Ratio in use: one /48 site for 1024 persons
-------------------->8

Which indeed seems quite reasonable. The problem with this is:
 'who is paying for which traffic and to whom'

One solution is an overlay network....

Notez bien, though this solves multihoming, it doesn't solve relocation,
thus if your company moves it has to renumber, and renumbering is no fun,
then again, you can most likely start from mostly scratch in the new location
and you might be able to tunnel (parts of) the old allocation to the new site
depending on which subnets/hosts one has moved already.

Greets,
 Jeroen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Current thread: