nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 daydreams
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:39:12 -1000
o a routing system which has the ability to scale really well in the presence of fewer and fewer nodes (think sites) where out-degree == 1sure... maybe. is there the presumption of e2e here?
i think so, for various valies of e2e
o mobilityprocess mobility? latency tolerent? any distinction btwn individual nodes or whole networks? need clarity here.
i think the user is gonna expect application binding mobility
o really scalable v4 backward compatibility so that we don't have the end-user-affecting mess which looms in a few yearswell... not so sure about this one. why do we care?
becuse isps have these folk called users who pay us money to see that they get the full internet (and let's not go down the silly rat hole of cogent vs level(3), thank you). randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Butterworth (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- IPv6 daydreams David Barak (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Paul G (Oct 17)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams David Barak (Oct 17)