nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: Douglas Dever <dougdever () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:47:28 -0400
On 10/5/05, Matthew Crocker <matthew () crocker com> wrote:
They did, and I'm not down. I see Level 3 via Sprint and GNAPs/CENT just fine. I didn't lose any connectivity to Level 3 at all. Bits moving down different pipes, not a big deal to me technically. The
So, where's the problem, exactly?
fact remains that Cogent is not providing the service I'm paying them for and they need to get it fixed.
Really? As you already pointed out, your packets are reaching their destination. So, they don't "need" to get anything "fixed." What utter nonsense... *shakes head and walks away* -doug
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Douglas Dever (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Alex Rubenstein (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James Spenceley (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering andrew matthews (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lamar Owen (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Leo Bicknell (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Deepak Jain (Oct 06)