![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 news
From: "Scott Morris" <swm () emanon com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:06:27 -0400
The problem with that (and many premises) is that we need to remember these arguments and foreseen "problems" were all dreamed up 10 or so years ago. The status of everyone's network, everyone's business needs and everyone's network design (and capabilities) were drastically different that long ago. It's a solution that made sense for far different reasons when it was created then it makes sense for now. *shrug* Scott -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Paul Vixie Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 12:08 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: IPv6 news drc () virtualized org (David Conrad) writes:
On Oct 15, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Tony Li wrote:When we explored site multihoming (not rehoming) in the ways that you seem to suggest, it was effectively a set of coordinated NAT boxes around the periphery of the site. That was rejected quite quickly.What were the reasons for rejection?
i wasn't there for that meeting. but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to-end, and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4." -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news), (continued)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Oct 18)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 18)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Oct 19)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 news Scott Morris (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 15)
- shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Owen DeLong (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) william(at)elan.net (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) John Payne (Oct 14)