nanog mailing list archives
Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?)
From: "Michael Painter" <tvhawaii () shaka com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:40:10 -1000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Ghali" <matt () snark net>
To: "Michael Painter" <tvhawaii () shaka com> Cc: "NANGO" <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Michael Painter wrote: I'd be very interested in what folks here think of this: http://news.com.com/Time+for+a+real+Internet+highway/2010-1028_3-5894664.html?tag=carsl I think it's a news.com.com.com URL, and therefore most likely not very worth opening, much less reading. I'm very interested in why you didn't bother at least summarizing the story as a general courtesy to folks here. matto
Sorry...I didn't realize that was the protocol.
"We already have our highway system and our electricity. Time has come for our broadband. It's a utility. We now need broadband to live, work, recreate and even make a profit. Whether in Palo Alto, Calif., or Cavalier, N.D., we need our broadband. Many local areas of America are attacking the need for broadband ubiquity, but perhaps it's time for a national program."From the article:
--Michael
Current thread:
- Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) J. Oquendo (Oct 14)
- RE: Time for a real Internet highway (?) David Schwartz (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Scott Weeks (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)