nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's side of the story
From: Ken Leland <kwl () shell monmouth com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:36:57 -0400
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:27:09PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I am a bit confused about why so many people think this is such a bad thing. Personally, I believe there is room in the market for partial transit providers. I guess that theory is about to be tested.
Agree that there is room in the market for attactively priced partial transit providers. Now where does that leave Level 3 after Nov 9th? Possibly with a second strategy reconsidertion. Ken Leland Monmouth Telecom
Current thread:
- Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Ken Leland (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Kevin Loch (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Simon Leinen (Oct 16)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 17)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Deepak Jain (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 07)