nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent move without renumbering
From: Charles Cala <charles_cala () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
(if i may shorten this a bit...) Q can an "end user" take non portable ip's with them to another service provider? --- "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net> wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote: Depending upon the circumstance, yes:
here is SOME of the raw data http://e-gerbil.net/ras/nac-case/ SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. MRS-C-87-04 JUNE 25, 2004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civil Action No. 04-cv-2831 June 24, 2004 perhaps folowups should be set to A.S.H.K
Current thread:
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Charles Cala (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Elmar K. Bins (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Charles Cala (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)