nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regulatory intervention
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:
Google Goes to Washington http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Goes_to_Washington/1128691070Google also has a responsibility not to bite the hand that feeds it - the laise faire, unregulated Internet. Shame on them. Google is not suffering at all from this.
Will the same regulations Google wants, also provide better oversight into how Google operates? When Google unilaterally removes or changes the rankings of its search results, I assume a government regulatory agency will be able to issue orders and control how Google operates its bottleneck search infrastructure to provide fair, neutral and transparent, in the government agency's opinion, of google's operations?
Current thread:
- Re: Regulatory intervention, (continued)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Tom Vest (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Joel Rowbottom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Daniel Golding (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Sean Donelan (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Henry Linneweh (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: Regulatory intervention Michael . Dillon (Oct 10)
- Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Oct 07)