nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public Works Peering
From: James Spenceley <james () iroute org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:46:23 +0300
A consortium of companies using this NAP would engineer the network since most times government officials have little clue on the engineering sideof things, nor would they understand it more than those already in the industry.
Having read this thread,I'm going to assume most of the engineers who want to peer there, are no more qualified than said government officials.
This NAP would be unbiased as to "my bgp tables are bigger than yours" arguments, and would pass traffic unbiased to most destinations without flaw.
the time of MLPA has long since passed, let it rest in peace.
J. Oquendo
-- James
Current thread:
- Public Works Peering J. Oquendo (Oct 06)
- mx error Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: mx error Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 06)
- Re: Public Works Peering James Spenceley (Oct 06)
- Re: Public Works Peering Michael . Dillon (Oct 06)
- Re: Public Works Peering Erik Haagsman (Oct 06)
- Re: Public Works Peering Steve Gibbard (Oct 06)
- mx error Randy Bush (Oct 06)