![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:31:06 -0400
On Oct 5, 2005, at 4:11 PM, Micheal Patterson wrote:
PSINet was on the verge of being a tier 1 as they had bilateral peering with the majority of the other tier 1 carriers at the time. Now, when Cogent took over the PSINet fiber backbone, I've no idea if they kept those peering points hot or not. If they did, then they should have plenty of pathing to L3 even with the direct peer being down
Please read the rest of the thread in an attempt to get unconfused. Thanks
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Tom Sands (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering sigma (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Dorian Kim (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Sean Butler (Oct 05)