nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:34:41 +0530
On 24/10/05, Alexei Roudnev <alex () relcom net> wrote:
We do not think, that _it wil be IPv6_. IPv6 is a good example of _second_ system, and do not looks as _succesfull_ for now. And it is not definitely _LAST PROTOCOL_.
enter jim fleming (or those chinese guys, more recently) with ipv9 srs
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Gregory Edigarov (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Alexei Roudnev (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 news Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)