nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues
From: Eric Gauthier <eric () roxanne org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:47:12 -0500
Heya,
Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes should be missing?
We've got a feed from Cogent out of Boston and we did see a 5 minute drop by about 5k routes in their annoucements. After that, we look as though we're only short by around 400 or so prefixes: 11/17/2005 9:30 172,380 11/17/2005 9:35 172,375 11/17/2005 9:40 172,364 11/17/2005 9:45 166,725 11/17/2005 9:50 170,978 11/17/2005 9:55 171,957 11/17/2005 10:00 171,961 11/17/2005 10:05 171,962 11/17/2005 10:10 171,937 11/17/2005 10:15 171,933 11/17/2005 10:20 171,928 11/17/2005 10:25 171,924 11/17/2005 10:30 171,920 11/17/2005 10:35 171,936 11/17/2005 10:40 171,933 Eric :)
Current thread:
- [NANOG]Cogent issues Lyons, Myke (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Elmar K. Bins (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Eric Gauthier (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Brian Kerr (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues David Barak (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Jon Lewis (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Brian Kerr (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Joe Abley (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Eric Gauthier (Nov 17)
- Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues Elmar K. Bins (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NANOG]Cogent issues David Hubbard (Nov 17)
- RE: [NANOG]Cogent issues Lyons, Myke (Nov 17)
- RE: [NANOG]Cogent issues Lyons, Myke (Nov 17)
- RE: [NANOG]Cogent issues Erik Sundberg (Nov 17)