nanog mailing list archives

Re: IAB and "private" numbering


From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:07:30 -0800


Geoff,

On Nov 13, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
This particular /8 allocation is described by IANA as "007/8 Apr 95 IANA - Reserved" in http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4- address-space while a whois query to the ARIN database reveals:
$ whois 7.0.0.0
...
RegDate:    1997-11-24
Updated:    1998-09-26
...
So in this case who is telling the truth? IANA or ARIN?

Well, IANA's registry claims data from 4/95 and ARIN's registry claims data from 9/98. I know which I would think would be telling the truth.

Would we want to change whois output to include the 'pub/priv' flag?
or "conflicting data" flag?

Nah. The right answer is to synchronize the data somehow. The data could either be replicated or a referral could be provided. Not rocket science.

I think I can state authoritatively (:-)) that the IANA is aware of (at least some of) the discrepancies and has address registry data synchronization on its priority list.

Rgds,
-drc




Current thread: