nanog mailing list archives
Re: a record?
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () hotnic net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:33:29 -0500
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Enjoy scanning, even I and I guess the rest of this list will be long time retired and sipping pina coladas and other good stuff (hot chocolate milk with whipcream and baileys anyone? :) in hawaii or some other heavenly place the day that the hardware and pipes are available to scan a single /64 efficiently.
There is no need to scan an entire /64. Lists of known hosts can be scanned for sparse addresses. Lists of known/likely subnets can be scanned for common human numbering patterns (think servers). Chances are good that every IPv6 node that talks to untrusted nodes will end up on one or more 31337 host lists. - Kevin
Current thread:
- a record? Randy Bush (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Jeroen Massar (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Gadi Evron (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Jeroen Massar (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Gadi Evron (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Kevin Loch (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Rob Thomas (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Randy Bush (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Dan Hollis (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Gadi Evron (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Jeroen Massar (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? william(at)elan.net (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Matthew Sullivan (Nov 14)
- Re: a record? Frank Louwers (Nov 15)
- Re: a record? John Levine (Nov 15)
- Re: a record? Matthew Sullivan (Nov 18)