nanog mailing list archives
Re: oh k can you see
From: "Sam Crooks" <scrooks () ebocom net>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:03:28 -0700
One of those pesky legal notice on all my outgoing email gets filtered by Randy's mail ... (the outgoing addition is not under my control).... maybe someone could tell him for me (as I can't email him...)
you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or whether it may be archived, etc.
i do not accept such email. my mail user agent detected a legal notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it. so do not expect further response.
yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal notice. well, my mail environment automatically detected it, deleted it, and sent this message to you. so don't expect a lot of sympathy.
randy
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 12:59 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
rfc 1546 is a good start i did not see sam's original query and he's not in my .procmailrc wonder why randy
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, and any attachments, are intended only for the lawful and specified use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are STRICTLY PROHIBITED from disclosing, printing, storing, disseminating, distributing or copying this communication, or admitting to take any action relying thereon, and doing so may be unlawful. It should be noted that any use of this communication outside of the intended and specified use as designated by the sender, may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail, fax and/or telephone, and destroy this original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: oh k can you see, (continued)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Bill Woodcock (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 07)
- Re: oh k can you see Sam Crooks (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Bill Woodcock (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Sam Crooks (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Maimon (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Maimon (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Sabri Berisha (Nov 02)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: oh k can you see Chris Woodfield (Nov 05)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 05)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 02)