nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: [Arch-econ] Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is being quoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:17:32 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Gordon Cook wrote:
Please note also Vint's remark:If ISPs were to inspect packets and interfere with those of competing application providers (voice, video), I would consider that a violation of the principle of network neutrality.
Would packet classification and per-hop queuing of different DSCP classes be considered "interference" in this world? What if a VOIP provider didn't want to pay for its packets to go in an EF queue, so the network processed the packets in the normal queue, is that a violation of your principles?
Current thread:
- Fwd: [Arch-econ] Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is being quoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill Gordon Cook (Nov 11)
- Re: [Arch-econ] Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is being quoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill Blaine Christian (Nov 11)
- Re: Fwd: [Arch-econ] Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is being quoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill Sean Donelan (Nov 11)