nanog mailing list archives
Re: oh k can you see
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:19:14 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
my naive view of your current deployment means that k can not be seen from any multi-homed sites unless one or more of their upstreams (recurse for tier-n) is even more clever and implements "t0 is our customer and we ignore NO_EXPORT toward customers," thus piling on yet another bit of cleverness, the implications of which we can discover in the next level of purgatory.
assuming we are talking about the well known community no-export, then i understand the problem. a better solution would be to peer only the anycast node, such that transit providers continue to propagate to the global internet (minus the peers seeing the shorter path). for wider distribution within the region, possibly using a transit provider for the anycast and use communities supported by the upstream to restrict announcement to its peers or upstreams or am i naive too? Steve
Current thread:
- Re: oh k can you see Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Steve Gibbard (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Bill Woodcock (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: oh k can you see Sam Crooks (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)