nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP terminology question
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () gettcomm com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:32:38 -0500
At 9:44 AM -1000 11/6/05, Randy Bush wrote:
> A peer should never announce a route it has already announced unlessthat route is withdrawn.one of many counterexamples: change in igp will cause change in med. any attribute changes, and announcement is required. e.g., an internal igp oscillation could cause what the op describes.
For the OP, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3345.txt
Current thread:
- BGP terminology question NetSecGuy (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question NetSecGuy (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question James Aldridge (Nov 08)
- Re: BGP terminology question Per Gregers Bilse (Nov 08)
- Re: BGP terminology question NetSecGuy (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question Tony Li (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question Randy Bush (Nov 06)
- Re: BGP terminology question Howard C. Berkowitz (Nov 07)
- Re: BGP terminology question Blaine Christian (Nov 07)
- Re: BGP terminology question Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 06)