nanog mailing list archives
Re: classful routes redux
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:49:12 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
er.. would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR members?class A == /32 class B == /48 class C == /56 hostroute == /64
It's quite arbitrary though, unlike the old classful IPv4 divisions - a matter of policy, not technology. The allocation sizes can and do vary over both time (as policy changes, IIRC RIPE used to assign /35s iirc, now it's /32) and between different RIRs.
A hostroute is /128 btw. ;) regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: QOTD: "Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there, I go to work."
Current thread:
- Re: classful routes redux, (continued)
- Re: classful routes redux Marshall Eubanks (Nov 05)
- Re: classful routes redux Paul Vixie (Nov 03)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)
- Re: classful routes redux bmanning (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)
- Re: classful routes redux bmanning (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 02)
- Re: classful routes redux Robert E . Seastrom (Nov 03)
- Re: classful routes redux Paul Jakma (Nov 02)
- Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)