Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now

[vijay gill <vgill () vijaygill com>]

Pete Templin wrote:
> John Curran wrote:
>
> > Cold-potato only addresses the long-haul; there's still cost on the
> > receiving network even if its handed off at the closest interconnect
> > to the final destination(s).
>
> And there's still revenue, as the traffic is going to customers (we all 
> filter our prefixes carefully, right?).  What's the problem with 
> cold-potato again, or should we all just try to double-dip?
>
> pt

ah yes, double dipping. On-net traffic should be charged a lot less, 
because after all, it is double dipping.

/vijay